FAILING TO FACE THE TRUTH
June 1, 2008 PM
Sermon Outline
MK 11:27-33
INTRO: The temple area in Jerusalem consisted of a succession of "courts" leading to the actual temple building. The first of the courts was the Court Of The Gentiles. It had become a very secular place. Indeed, it was filled with stalls of vendors selling animals for sacrifices and of money changers who changed the coinage of the realm into the accepted shekel of the sanctuary (Num 3:47). It was anything but a place for preparation, prayer and contemplation! Into this place came Jesus driving out the merchants and charging, "Ye have made it a den of thieves" (Mk 11:17). That is the background against which the text we have read takes place. Jesus has acted with authority. The religious leaders of that day, probably members of the Jewish Sanhedrin, wanted to know by what authority Jesus did such a thing.
- THE JEWISH "DELEGATION"
- Mk 11:27 - "...and as he was walking in the temple..."
- it was customary for rabbis and teachers to teach in one of the "porches"
- in all likelihood, Jesus was walking, teaching in "Solomon's porch" - teaching as one walked was apparently a custom of that time
- notice Jno 10:23 for the custom of Jesus
- Doubtless, representatives of the Sanhedrin
- activities in the temple area were under the control of such "officers"
- they knew they had not authorized Jesus to any action or instruction
- their coming, as they did, in full view of the crowded temple was likely calculated to embarrass and discredit Jesus before the people
- Mk 11:28 - "By what authority ... who gave thee this authority..."
- they knew they had not given Him any permission, authority
- if He claimed the authority of God, they could accuse of blasphemy
- he could have been arrested on the spot ... and discredited
- Mk 11:27 - "...and as he was walking in the temple..."
- HOW DID JESUS ANSWER THIS QUESTION?
- Jesus certainly knew that the delegation's motives were not good
- their question was almost a "have you stopped beating your wife" question
- any way He answered would have given them the cause they sought
- remember, Mk 11:18 - the plotting had already begun!
- So, Jesus answered their question with a question
- He did not refuse outright to answer them
- but His answer would be contingent upon their answering His question
- the question with which He answered would answer their question
- Mk 11:30 - whence was the authority of John's baptism?
- this question placed the delegation in a very precarious position
- they were, in fact, in a greater dilemma than He
- Lk 7:29,30 - rejecting John's baptism was rejecting God's commandment
- Mk 11:31-33a - "If we shall say ... but if we shall say..."
- it was obvious that they were not concerned about truth!
- they were just concerned to give an answer not exposing their character
- if they said they believed John's baptism and testimony were from heaven, they would exposed their failure to accept John's identifying Jesus as the Messiah
- if they said John's baptism and testimony were of men, they would raise the anger of the people since he was believed by them to be a prophet
- their solution? "We cannot tell." (Translation? "We will not tell")
- Mk 11:33b - So, Jesus did not give them the answer they sought from Him!
- Jesus certainly knew that the delegation's motives were not good
- FAILING TO ACCEPT THE TRUTH
- These religious leaders had rejected the truth!
- there was ample well documented testimony that Jesus was God's Son
- the voice of God, the voice of John, the miracles, the teaching
- but "truth" just was not popular among the wise of the world
- even Pilate would ask, "What is truth?" (Jno 18:39) as a means of escaping a dilemma in which truth was obvious ... but unpopular
- Rejecting the truth has its own problems
- it often puts one in the wrong company
- it puts one in a position of having to believe a lie even in the face of credible testimony
- it keeps one from the peace of mind of well founded confidence
- it will place one in uncomfortable "positions" without real justification for those positions
- These religious leaders had rejected the truth!
CLOSE: One thing is certain. "Truth" will not go away. By killing Jesus, they thought "truth" would just go away. It did not! The only right and sensible response to truth is to embrace it and live by it. They did not. Will you?
Cecil A. Hutson
01 June 2008