A STRATEGIC WITHDRAWAL...BUT NOT IN DEFEAT
October 1, 2006 PM
Sermon Outline
MK 3:7-12
INTRO: The verses I have read very likely cover some considerable time between thehealing of the man with the withered hand and the selection of the twelve apostles. Luke simply refers to "those days" (Lk 6:12). Matthew, on the other hand, gives us a bit more of the specifics of this period than either Luke or Mark. Remember, though, that the gospel of Mark skims over some periods with but a glance, and this is one of those places in which Mark seems to be hurrying on to the next major event in Jesus' ministry ... the appointment of the twelve apostles. Still, there may be something of value to be learned even with this hurried overview of time.
I. THIS SECTION BEGINS AS JESUS WITHDRAWS FROM THE SYNAGOGUE
A. Why did He withdraw?
1. it was hardly from fear of confrontation with Pharisees and others
2. but it was also true that opposition was becoming very serious
3. Mk 3:6 - the alliance here shows just how serious opposition was!
B. But Jesus was not ready for the kind of opposition which would mean death
1. note these verses: Jno 2:4 - 7:6,30 - 8:20 - "mine hour is not yet come"
2. compare: Jno 12:23 and 13:1 - "the hour is come"
3.Jesus' withdrawal was necessary in order for Him to accomplish His purpose prior to his atoning death
C. There are times when "withdrawal" is the wise course
1. bullheaded, stubborn confrontation usually does no good
2. withdrawal may leave further opportunities open which confrontation would otherwise close
3. this lesson in relationships, I believe, is a wise, helpful lesson
II. DURING THIS PERIOD, GREAT MULTITUDES FOLLOWED HIM
A. The first place He apparently went was to the familiar seaside
1. yes, Jesus could teach in a synagogue or the temple
2. but his "classroom" more often than not was in a noninstitutional place!
3. and so many of His illustrations were taken from such settings
B. The crowd must have been very, very large - "a great multitude"
1. Mark notes that Jesus was concerned that "they should throng him"!
2. so, He had His disciples arrange for a small boat for safety reasons
3. Mk 4:1 - there was the time when a small boat became his "pulpit" because the crowd was so large
C. The people in the multitude came from numerous places
1. His reputation had already spread to distant places
2. people came from every quarter of the compass - from great distances
3. thinking of this, I wonder if we have become too accustomed to convenience, comfort? they came, they stood, they listened ... how interested are we in the Savior? in hearing of Him?
III. THE NECESSITY OF HIS MIRACLES?
A. Mark observes that "he had healed many"
1. on this occasion people were not waiting for some personal encounter
2. they simply sought to touch Him - although there is no mention of faith here, I cannot help but think that it was their faith which made them whole
3. Mt 9:20-22 - here is a specific occasion which includes mention of faith
B. So, why were His miracles necessary?
1. Jno 20:30,31 with Acts 2:22 - necessary to confirm His claims
2. even the miracles did not change the hard hearts of some
3. but listen to Jno 3:2 ... and consider Lk 7:19-22 (confirmation to John the Baptist and his disciples)
IV. THE UNCLEAN SPIRITS AGAIN
A. They apparently occupied the bodies of human beings
1. I don't presume to understand this unique period of time
2. unique in that the struggle between God's purpose and that of Satan was at its zenith
3. I recall God's words at Gen 3:15
B. He consistently forbade their making Him known as "the Son of God"
1. such testimony could well cause a belief that He was in league with them
2. indeed, that was one claim the scribes would make!
3. He neither needed nor wanted testimony of Satan's world!
CLOSE: The fact is, however, that He is the Son of God. Yes, He would often refer to Himself as the Son of Man. But everything He said and did was confirmation that He is exactly Who that voice from heaven had said He is ... "my beloved son"! And you and I have a decision to make. What will that fact mean to us?
Cecil A. Hutson
01 October 2006