THE MAN WITH A WITHERED HAND...AND THE SABBATH
September 17, 2006 PM
Sermon Outline
MK 3:1-6
INTRO: For the faithful Jews the sabbath was a very important day. Observing the sabbath was ordained in the ten commandments. Over time, however, two things happened historically. There were those periods in Jewish history when the sabbath was ignored, profaned. Then, there came that time when the sabbath was burdened with so many man made rules that it lost its God given purpose. Jesus came into the latter of those periods of time. It was obvious, almost from the beginning of His public ministry, that the sabbath would become a point of serious controversy with the Jews who honored man made traditions at the expense of the revealed will of God. So, in our study from the gospel of Mark this evening we see Jesus healing a man on the sabbath.
I. THE SABBATH AND THE SYNAGOGUE ... AGAIN
A. The previous incident in Mark's gospel had occurred on the sabbath
1. that incident involved the issue of His disciples plucking grain to eat
2. my supposition is that the first incident may well have transpired in or around the synagogue
B. So, Jesus returns to the synagogue on another sabbath day
1. on the sabbath Jesus' custom was to go to the synagogue (Lk 4:16)
2. according to the law of Moses, Jesus honored the sabbath
II. IN THE SYNAGOGUE WAS A MAN WITH A WITHERED HAND
A. It may be necessary to look at three gospel accounts to "get the picture"
1. in Matthew's account the Pharisees ask Him a question (Mt 12:10)
2. in Markand Luke it is Jesus Who asks a question (Mk 3:4)
3. putting these together gives us a picture of their probably calling attention to the man and asking their question in view of His previous teaching about the sabbath ... are there ulterior motives here? likely
B. The man with the withered hand?
1. we are not told what had caused his hand to shrivel
2. Lk 6:6 tells us it was the man's right hand which was affected
3. significance? if the man was right handed (probably was), his ability to earn a living was very likely minimized severely ... a compassionate case
III. THE OPPOSITION
A. The Pharisees were watching Him
1. the word "watch" means to scrutinize, to watch carefully
2. the use of this word puts Jesus "under the microscope"
3. were all the Pharisees of this mind set? no, but apparently most were
B. Lk 6:7 - Here is why they were watching Him
1.they are actively seeking a way they can bring charges against Him
2.remember, violating the sabbath was a capital crime among the Jews
3.so, they are, as we might say, "setting Jesus up" here
IV. THEIR QUESTION - HIS QUESTIONS
A. Their question concerned lawfulness of healing on the sabbath
1. their many sabbath regulations forbade healing on the sabbath
2. thus, the question at Mt 12:10 had the background of man made law
3. absolutely nothing in Moses' law would forbid healing
B. Notice how Jesus turns the question upon them
1. is it lawful to do good or to do evil? to save a life or to kill?
2. Mt 12:11:12 - Jesus uses their own practices to show it is right to do good on Sabbath days - their own inconsistencies were too obvious
3. for them to have answered His question would have been their own condemnation of themselves - so, "they held their peace"
4. Jas 4:17 becomes relevant at this point!
V. HOW JESUS RESPONDED?
A. He is angry, and He is grieved
1. His anger is moral indignation because of their hardened hearts
2. His grief is also because of their hardened hearts
3. their hearts they had closed to God's truth by their own traditions/laws
B. He openly healed the man's withered hand - He is Lord of the sabbath!
1. notice that Mark says, "His hand was restored whole as the other"
2. rehab was not necessary ... this was the nature of Jesus' miracles
3. what should have been an occasion of joy to all was not, however
C. Mk 3:6 - the Pharisees immediately sought a way to "destroy him"
1. and they took counsel with their enemies, the Herodians!
2. when we want to find a way to justify ourselves or to do a wrong thing, we may find ourselves in company we would not otherwise consider
3. the dye is cast ... the confrontation is now on track!
CLOSE: Oh, how careful we need to be about tradition. Tradition is not always a bad thing. But when it gets in the way of God's will and way, it is a bad thing. Defending tradition at all costs will invariable put us at odds with truth.
Cecil A. Hutson
17 September 2006