HOW TO CHANGE THE STANDARD?
February 12, 2006 AM
Sermon Outline
1 PET 1:22-25
INTRO: In our sermon study last Lord's day morning, I affirmed that the word of God is the unchanging standard by which ethical and moral behavior is measured and determined. As I was preaching that lesson, it occurred to me that there are many people who would agree with that statement at first glance but who, in fact, are seeking to change the standard! There are even those in the Lord's church who are proposing viewpoints which change the standard. But how does one change an unchanging standard? It does not require an outright, frontal attack such as atheists might make. It is a much more subtle process than that. And because it is so subtle, it is all the more dangerous.
I. LET ME BEGIN BY AFFIRMING...
A. The word of God is an unchanging standard
B. The word of God is a reliable pattern for matters ethical, moral & spiritual
II. BUT THERE ARE THOSE SEEKING TO CHANGE THE PATTERN - HOW?
A. By declaring many of the early narratives to be Jewish legend
1. this immediately casts doubt on the reliability of the scriptures
2. Mt 19:4 - Mt 12:39,40 - Jesus cited as factual information about the creation and Jonah and his being in the belly of the great fish
B. By referring to the "many" contradictions, etc. one finds in scripture
1. how can a book filled with such errors, contradictions be reliable?
2. in fact, most of the so-called contradictions are resolved with careful study and the few "errors" are the mistakes of copyists and none has any bearing on the message of truth
C. By declaring that Jesus really did not say all those "words in red"
1. the small group called "Jesus Seminar" has arbitrarily made this charge
2. because they are supposed to be scholars and because their claims appeal to news media types, they have gotten attention - but their claims are arbitrary and have no critical or historical foundation!
D. By declaring the epistles to be love letters - not authoritative commands
1. does that mean they're sentimental, emotional ... but not directive?
2. 1 Cor 14:37 - the epistles give frequent directives in imperative mode - they are not suggestions ... they are commandments
E. By declaring the epistles are secondary to the gospels
1. the letters have less weight, importance, authority than the 4 gospels
2. 2 Tim 3:16,17 - 2 Pet 15,16 - it is the Holy Spirit Who revealed the gospels and the epistles - who am I to decide that anything revealed by the Holy Spirit is of secondary importance
F. By declaring that there is a "core gospel"
1. so, certain "core" things are of greater importance than other things
2. but who decides which things should be in the "core"? once again, we are confronted with the arbitrary decisions of men who have an agenda!
G. By declaring the N. T. was written against the background of 1st century
1. thus, we must look for meaning beyond that is written in scripture - not what did he say, but what did he mean to say
2. while it is true the N.T. was revealed, written in the 1st century, the great truths and doctrines revealed therein are not "time sensitive" and are foundational to belief and practice in any age! - 2 Tim 2:2
H. By declaring that words have the meanings a reader assigns to them
1. so, truth would truly be "in the eye of the beholder"
2. but words do have meanings more "objectively assigned" than by one who chooses to give them meanings based on personal biases - 2 Tim 1:13
I. By declaring a 2000 year old document cannot address today's life
1. simply put, the Bible is declared to be out of date and out of touch
2. however, the ethical, moral and spiritual truths and issues addressed in scripture are a fresh and up to date as "today" - the environment may change with time, but people's needs, society's needs and truth do not change!
III. SO, WHAT ARE WE TO DO?
A. We must place our trust and confidence in the scriptures
1. that will mean refusing to listen to the many "voices" of confusion
2. that will mean becoming the target of sarcasm, ridicule
3. that will mean, however, always having a certain standard to guide
B. It amounts to this...
1. choosing between the wisdom of men and the wisdom of God!
2. 1 Cor 2:4,5 - I choose for my faith to rest in the power & wisdom of God
3. yes, I will have to study; yes, I will have to make some hard choices; yes, I will likely be called a "legalist"; yes, I will not be considered "in crowd" material
4. but I will know which direction is north and south and east and west ... because the word of God is my compass
CLOSE: I can assure you that efforts to change the standard are all around us ... and will be ongoing. But as for me and my house, we choose the faith resting upon the revealed, understandable word of God.
Cecil A. Hutson
12 February 2006