IT REALLY DOES MATTER WHAT YOU BELIEVE ABOUT BAPTISM
December 18, 2005 AM
Sermon Outline
MK 16:15,16
INTRO: Religious discussion always seems to have in some element of tension and controversy. Perhaps that is why there are those folks who choose never to talk about politics and religion! Safe subjects like the weather are topics in which we rarely find ourselves with tension. Even in the time of Christ, there was controversy surrounding Him and what He taught! A book in my library is called Christ, The Controversialist. It is safe to say that baptism has become a subject of controversy. And the controversy is not new. Various elements relating to this subject began perhaps as early as the 2nd or 3rd centuries. But the New Testament comes to our rescue with simple, unambiguous language to resolve controversies. And it really does matter what you believe about baptism.
I. THAT IT IS ESSENTIAL TO SALVATION
A. This is one of the points of controversy surrounding the subject
1. many (most) groups claiming Christian roots practice baptism
2. but for the vast majority of them it is not taught as essential
3. among these groups, salvation comes at the point of belief
B. What does the New Testament say?
1. Mk 16:16 - belief + baptism = saved
2. 1 Pet 3:21 - baptism doth also now save us
3. yes, belief in Jesus is absolutely necessary ... but it is clear that baptism is, too
C. Think about this from another viewpoint
1. Acts 2:38 - if baptism is necessary for remission of sins, can a person be saved before his sins are remitted ... saved, but still under condemnation?
2. Gal 3:27 - if one is baptized into Christ, can one be saved before he is in Christ?
3. such texts as these certainly clarify baptisms necessity
II. THAT IT IS FOR BELIEVERS
A. Here is another point of controversy for many
1. why? because infants are baptized - unbelieving infants
2. now, I know about the idea that infants inherit Adams guilt
3. but let me suggest a couple of texts: Ezek 18:20 & Rom 5:12 - no ambiguity here ... just plain language
B. What does the New Testament say?
1. Mk 16:16 - here is that belief again - infants cannot be believers
2. Rom 10:17 - faith (belief) is the result of hearing the word of come and coming to a reasoned conclusion based on it - infants simply cannot do this
3. one who does not believe may be dunked ... but he is not baptized
4. infants neither have the need for nor the possibility of baptism
III. THAT IT IS IMMERSION IN WATER
A. And, again, here is a point of contention, division
1. most baptize by sprinkling water on babies
2. others insist that N. T. baptism must be immersion
3. and some are just indifferent about it saying its only a symbol anyway
B. What does the New Testament say?
1. first, the word baptize is defined to dip, to plunge, to immerse - in scripture the idea of sprinkle is just never found
2. Rom 6:3,4 - baptism is in likeness of Jesus death, burial, resurrection
3. if following the N.T. pattern in such matters is necessary (and it is), immersion must be the baptism we practice
IV. THAT BAPTISM IS THE POINT OF ENTRY INTO THE BODY
A. Acts 2:47 notes that the Lord adds the saved to the body
1. what do we know about those of whom Luke wrote?
2. from v. 41 we know that they had been baptized
3. from v. 38 we know that they were penitent people who believed that Jesus is the Christ (v. 37)
B. Gal 3:26,27 and 1 Cor 12:13
1. these passages clearly (no ambiguity) tell us that when one is baptized he is baptized into Christ ... into the body
2. can one be saved apart from the body ... apart from Christ? no
3. yes, it is the Lord Who adds the saved ... but the point at which that adding takes place is baptism ... and it is the same for all
CLOSE: Dear friends, it really does matter what you believe about baptism. Indeed, what you believe about it will determine the action you take. What we believe about baptism must, must be based on New Testament teaching ... not on feelings, traditions, decisions of church councils. If you have never been baptized in keeping with the things we have discussed, I hope you will choose to do so this morning!
Cecil A. Hutson
18 December 2005