THE PROBLEM OF FALSE TEACHERS
July 17, 2005 PM
Sermon Outline
2 PET 2:1-3
INTRO: While it was true that the apostles were eyewitnesses of so many things which confirmed to them the certainty of Jesus claims (the transfiguration, for example) and that they presented the gospel positively in view of their own eyewitness experiences, there were those who would deny, bend, twist, modify, etc. the apostolic message. The tragic effect of this was/is they overthrow the faith of some (2 Tim 2:18). Jesus, at the very beginning of His earthly ministry said, Beware of false prophets... (Mt 7:15). As Peters second letter continues, he focuses his attention on the false teachers who were apparently already doing their harm and whose efforts would continue into the future.
I. THERE WERE FALSE PROPHETS
A. Peter has referred to holy men of God who prophesied in old time
1. he qualified his remarks by identifying these men as holy
2. and he makes clear that they were moved by the holy spirit
B. But there were also false prophets in old time
1. Jude referred to Balaam and his greed (Jude 1:11) - he would say good things such as in Num 22:18 ... and do things to hurt Gods people (Deut 31:16)
2. Jeremiah had to contend with false prophets - Jer 14:13,14 ... false prophets created confusion, apostasy in old time
II. JUST AS THEN, THERE WILL BE FALSE TEACHERS
A. What would/will they teach?
1. Peter mentions damnable heresies - false doctrines which would divide
a. consider: Rom 16:17,18 - Eph 4:14 - 1 Tim 1:10
b. their heresies might take many forms - all contrary to sound doctrine
c. note: 2 Tim 2:18 - here was one such heresy (resurrection is past)
2. Peter also mentions denying the Lord
a. denying His deity; denying that He came in the flesh; etc.
b. 1 Jno 4:2 - some of that day denied Christ came in the flesh
c. in effect, however, any teaching which takes people away from the truth of the gospel is a denying of the Lord!
B. What would be their method?
1. one key to their method is privily shall bring in (v. 1)
2. the language refers to bringing in something along side of ... so, the false teachers would not be open about their false and fatal doctrines
3. they would use enough truth to make their doctrines seem o.k.
4. feigned words (v. 3) is another indicator
5. feigned is from Gr. word from which we get our word plastic - so, words easily manipulated, bent, twisted - one wrote of the: The false teachers use our vocabulary, but they do not use our dictionary
C. Their ingratitude?
1. notice that they deny the Lord that bought them
2. remember 1 Cor 6:19,20 - ye are bought with a price
3. these false teachers were Christians who had become apostate!
4. their lives and behavior were demonstrations of ingratitude to the Lord - they sought to undo all that He had come to do!
D. Their motive?
1. Peter refers to their covetousness and making merchandise of you
2. what did they covet? Influence? Power? Followers? Money? - were not told exactly what - but covetousness is inordinate desire for something
3. Peter also mentions many shall follow...
4. Acts 20:30 - to have a following! Pride!
E. The tragedy of false teachers?
1. many shall follow their pernicious (lascivious) ways (v. 2)
2. the use of the word pernicious (or, lascivious) suggest that these false teachers were behaving in shameless ways ... is it possible that they were teaching that sinful behavior was acceptable behavior?
3. the way of truth was maligned by their teaching and behavior
4. in any case, their way was attractive to Christians whose faith may have been weak, wavering, not well rooted (Col 2:4,7,8)
5. the ultimate tragedy? Lost souls!
F. The fate of false teachers?
1. Swift destruction (v. 1) - their damnation (v. 3)
2. scripture has always taken a dim view of false prophets; false teachers
3. so, Gods judgment awaits those who fall into this category
CLOSE: Remember, the false teachers of whom Peter wrote were not unbelievers from the outside. They were not those from whom one would expect heresy. They were Christians who were people with charisma ... teaching things which were just not true! Sweet friends, there is a very important and needed message here for us!
Cecil A. Hutson
July 17, 2005