I WAS THERE!
June 19, 2005 PM
Sermon Outline
2 PET 1:16-18
INTRO:2 Peter is written to correct some myths being circulated by false teachers within the church. Times have not changed all that much. There were purveyors of error then, and there are those today, within the body, who would have you believe things foreign to the word. One of the great errors Peter wrote to correct had to do with the Lords return. There were those who taught that Jesus would not be returning to claim His own. In chapter 3 Peter called them scoffers. But Peter knew that Jesus would come again!
I. WHAT HE TAUGHT WAS NOT ARTFUL FABLE
A. Yes, the religious world did (does) have its fables
1. the pagan world was rife with such tales and stories
2. even the Jewish world had its own spurious works
B. Apostolic writers warned about fables
1. 1 Tim 1:4 & 4:7
2. 2 Tim 4:3,4
3. Titus 1:13,14
4. fables are inventions; they are not truth!
C. Peter (with James and John) was an eyewitness
1. he had been with Jesus through teaching, miracles
2. he refers here to the transfiguration
3. and he had seen the risen Jesus - 1 Cor 15:4,5
4. Peters testimony, remembrance was not hearsay
II. PETER KNEW THAT THE LORD WOULD COME AGAIN
A. Perhaps, however, his reason for knowing seems a bit strange
1. he does not cite words of the Lord, promises
2. he cites the transfiguration event as his reason!
3. what does this have to do with combating error?
B. Why refer to the transfiguration?
1. clearly, they saw majesty - Lk 9:29
2. they say Elijah and Moses ... alive and talking - Lk 9:30
3. they heard them talk of Jesus decease (exodus) ... not of His death (exodus is not the usual word for death - and Peter chose that word of himself at 2 Pet 1:15)
4. the glory of God surrounded them - Lk 9:34 (bright cloud - Mt 17:5)
5. they heard Gods voice declare that Jesus is His son - Lk 9:35
6. they heard God attest to integrity, validity of Jesus words - Lk 9:35 (so, Lk 9:22 with Lk 9:51)
7. this was an event of monumental importance to Jesus integrity ... and to Peters - Peter is able to declare, I was there. I saw it all. I heard it all
C. Now, what else had Peter seen?
1. Acts 1:9-11 - I was there!
2. how could anyone doubt the Lords coming again? there were eyewitness accounts ... no fables
3. and Paul wrote: 1 Thes 4:13-18
4. true, His coming would not be of the same sort as before ... but He is coming!
5. and what did John write? Jno 14:1-3 with Rev 22:20
6. remove the Lords coming, and there is simply no reason to the faith
7. Acts 17:31 - ...whereof he hath given assurance unto all men...
D. I hear great reverence, significance at 2 Pet 1:17,18
1. I heard Gods voice clearly - I was there
2. but this was just after Peter had proposed the three tabernacles - a proposal suggesting equal weight with the law and prophets ... a proposal which God quickly rejected!
3. Peter knew Jesus would come again!
CLOSE: Where is our anticipation? Interestingly, both Peter and Paul include holy living with their discussions of Jesus return. If we anticipate, we must, then, live holy, godly lives. 2 Pet 3:11 - Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness...
Cecil A. Hutson
June 19, 2005