MARK- THE GOSPEL OF ACTION
August 17, 2003 PM
Sermon Outline
MK 1:9-13
INTRO: The gospel of Mark is direct and to the point. It can be quickly read, and one has the feeling that there was much, much more. But John Mark is giving an overview of events, and his overview makes a very effective study outline. There is so much speculation surrounding this gospel, and some of it I will want to address in our thoughts here. I would guess, and it is only a guess, that the gospel of Mark is the least quoted of the gospel records. Matthew and Luke, because of their accounts of Jesus birth and their lengthy accounts of the end of his life are quoted often. John, because of Jno 3:16, is certainly quoted often. But as I have read over the years and as I have listened to teachers and preachers, it seems the gospel of Mark is not mentioned a great deal. Well, lets look for a little while at this book and its author.
I. WHO WAS MARK?
A. What the book of Actstells us?
1. Acts 1212 - The son of Mary - an apparent friend of Peter
2. Acts 12:25 - An early companion of Barnabas and Paul
3. Acts 15:36-40 - A source of contention between Paul and Barnabas
B. Other helpful references?
1. Col 4:10 - he was a cousin of Barnabas (explaining his loyalty to Mark?)
2. Philm 1:24 - a fellow laborer with Paul (relationship has changed)
3. 2 Tim 4:11 - misunderstandings can be resolved ... strong, warm relationships grow through years
4. 1 Pet 5:13 - Marcus, my son (Mark may well have been to Peter what Timothy was to Paul)
5. point? Mark had ample opportunity to know from credible witnesses details of the life and work of Jesus!
II. SOME OBSERVATIONS AS I READ THROUGH THIS BOOK
A. This gospel covers generally the period mentioned in Acts 1:21,22
1. no information here about his birth and early years
2. Mark has Jesus bursting upon the world stage in action
3. John the Baptist sets the stage ... then, enter Jesus
B. The frequent use of the word straightway
1. this word is used 19 times in Mark - many more times than other gospels
2. this word suggests that Mark is very much a book of action and movement
3. some suggest that Mark is designed with the Roman reader in mind - thus, Mark gave more attention to what Jesus did than to what He said (maybe?)
C. The brevity of accounts of events
1. yes, many of the same events as in Matthew and Luke
2. but Mark does not go into the detail other writers did
3. illustrations? Mk 1:12,13 - Mk 4:33,34 (but many of the parables of Matthew 13, for example, are not included here)
D. Very little reference to fulfilled prophecy
1. especially is this true when compared to Matthew
2. if, however, Mark is directed toward a different sort of reader (Jews vs. Romans), such a fact would be understandable
3. there are references to the Old Covenant ... but not with prophetic emphasis
E. A special notation about forgiveness - Mk 11:25,26
1. in this passage Jesus places the initiative to forgive upon the offended party
2. we have often stress Matthews emphasis on the offenders going to offended
3. but Mark reminds the offended of his responsibility to take the initiative in forgiving ... and Mark emphasizes that our own forgiveness from the Father depends on our forgiving others
F. The sentiment at Mk 16:7 - ...and Peter...
1. why did the Lord mention only Peter here?
2. I have long believed it was because of Peters blatant denials and his needing to know that he had no need to fear reunion with the Lord - all is forgiven
3. this action on the Lords part certainly adds to what we have noted above
about initiating forgiveness
G. The controversial last verses of this book
1. vv. 9-20 are often missing in more recent translations
2. apparently, two old MSS do not have the ending of Marks gospel - others do, however
3. interestingly, some of the versions which are older that the MSS do have the verses in question as the ending of Marks gospel - and references are made to the last verses by ancient writers
4. bottom line? there really is no doubt of the authenticity of Marks gospel - from 1:1 to 16:20
CLOSE: That the gospel of Mark was inspired by the Holy Spirit there can be no doubt. That Marks associations Barnabas, Peter and Paul (and others) qualified him to write this to the point gospel record there can be no doubt. It is an exceptional and helpful record.
Cecil A. Hutson
17 August 2003